Wi-Fi vs Cellular for Asset Tracking

September 28, 2021

Wi-Fi vs Cellular for Asset Tracking

Ah, the world of asset tracking. It's a world where accuracy and reliability reign supreme. When it comes to tracking your assets, there are essentially two options: Wi-Fi and cellular. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, so we've put them head-to-head for a fair and factual comparison.

Wi-Fi

Wi-Fi asset tracking utilizes Wi-Fi access points to track assets within range. It's a low-cost solution with high accuracy, as Wi-Fi access points are fixed and the signal can be picked up by a Wi-Fi-enabled asset tag.

Advantages of Wi-Fi for Asset Tracking:

  • High Accuracy: Wi-Fi access points are fixed and have a known location, making it easy to locate assets with Wi-Fi-enabled tags accurately.
  • Low Cost: Wi-Fi infrastructure is already present in most buildings and facilities, so the cost of adding Wi-Fi asset tracking is relatively low.
  • Low Power Consumption: Wi-Fi tags consume less power than cellular tags, meaning they will last longer before requiring a battery change.

Disadvantages of Wi-Fi for Asset Tracking:

  • Limited Range: Wi-Fi hotspots have a limited range, usually around 50-100 feet, meaning that assets outside of range cannot be tracked.
  • Infrastructure Dependent: As Wi-Fi tags rely on access points to track, the infrastructure must be in place, which may not be possible in remote or outdoor environments.
  • Limited Scalability: Wi-Fi networks have a finite capacity, meaning that large-scale asset tracking may strain the network.

Cellular

Cellular asset tracking utilizes cellular networks to provide tracking information. This makes it an ideal solution for tracking assets in remote or outdoor environments where Wi-Fi infrastructure may not be possible.

Advantages of Cellular for Asset Tracking:

  • Large Range: Cellular coverage is prevalent, making it possible to track assets in remote or outdoor environments.
  • Real-time Tracking: Cellular networks provide real-time tracking data, making it ideal for time-sensitive applications.
  • Scalability: Cellular networks have a high capacity, making it possible to track a large number of assets simultaneously.

Disadvantages of Cellular for Asset Tracking:

  • High Cost: Cellular asset tracking requires cellular data plans, which can be expensive when tracking a large number of assets.
  • Power Consumption: Cellular tags consume more power than Wi-Fi tags, meaning they will require battery changes more frequently.
  • Limited Accuracy: Cellular tracking may not provide the same level of accuracy as Wi-Fi tracking, as cellular towers are not as precisely located.

Conclusion

In summary, both Wi-Fi and cellular asset tracking have their advantages and disadvantages, making it essential to choose the right solution for your unique tracking needs. Wi-Fi is a cost-effective solution with high accuracy, but it may not be suitable for remote or outdoor environments. Cellular, on the other hand, provides real-time tracking and scalability, but at a higher cost and lower accuracy.

Whether you choose Wi-Fi or cellular, asset tracking is an investment into your business's efficiency and safety, with the potential to save you both time and money.

References

  1. Choosing between Wi-Fi and Cellular for Asset Tracking
  2. What Is Wi-Fi Asset Tracking? The Pros and Cons
  3. Cellular vs. Wi-Fi vs. BLE for Asset Tracking and Monitoring Technology

© 2023 Flare Compare